• Slider Image

DOWNLOAD FACT SHEET

What Dynegy Is Proposing, and Why It Won't Work

Vermilion County residents, officials and local experts are taking issue with any proposal that would allow Dynegy to leave its toxic coal ash in the floodplain of the Middle Fork River. While specifics surrounding Dynegy's proposal are not known, we do know that:

  • Dynegy's prior plan included leaving the ash in the floodplain of the river and capping the three pits with 2.5 inches of a geomembrane; 15 inches of a geocomposite; and 3 feet of soil. This is a short-term, cost-cutting solution for the company that would leave the liability of the ash stored at this site to future generations.
  • Dynegy's November 2, 2017 submittal to the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency shows two options for stabilizing banks along the Old East and North Ash Pits that would set the stage for leaving the ash in place.
  • The utility is promoting the "cap and leave" solution with riverbank stabilization similar to that installed at the New East Ash Pit as their best option for protecting the river from coal ash pollution.  During the summer and fall of 2017 Dynegy has taken local officials and opinion leaders on tours in an attempt to counter assertions made by Eco-Justice Collaborative, Prairie Rivers Network, and others that this solution will not stop groundwater pollution nor protect the river, long-term, from ongoing erosion.

  • The IEPA issued a notice of violation in 2012 for groundwater exceedances of heavy metals.

Seeps and pollution are already occurring.  This is because there is contact between the unlined ponds and groundwater (which flows through the pits toward the river).  In 2008, the IEPA found that coal ash pollution was flowing into the river from seeps along the riverbank that abuts the two oldest pits. According to a January 2013 internal IEPA email, an agency representative “had no problem collecting seepage at the base of the berm, which is right on the riverbank.”  Water quality analysis confirmed this was ash seepage (leachate, i.e., groundwater entering the surface water), and that boron from seeps at the “lower pond” (the Old East Ash Pit) was present at about three times the chronic water quality standard. This seepage can only be seen from the river. Click here to watch a short video showing seeps actively leaching chemicals along the Old East Ash Pit. This film clip was taken by Eco-Justice Collaborative in June of 2017.

Flash floods and the strong erosional forces of the river will continue to undermine any stabilization measures that might be installed. Severe riverbank erosion near the ash pits has been an ongoing problem for decades:

  • Illinois Power installed gabions (wire cages with rocks) along the bank adjacent to the Old East and North Pits in the 1980s. But the gabions have been ripped away from the bank of the Middle Fork by the powerful forces of the river. This has left the riverbank vulnerable to erosion once again, and the wire mesh that now is located in the river’s channel (instead of on the bank) is a hazard for those who use the Middle Fork for recreation.
  • Dynegy had to seek emergency approval from state and federal agencies to shore up the bank next to the New East Ash Pit in the fall of 2016. This was because the river had eroded as much as 20 feet of protective bank next to the ash pit in just six years. According to their own internal correspondence, Dynegy reported that at one location just 10 feet remained between the river and the toe of the slope of the New East Ash Pit, making failure a real possibility. The erosion was so extensive that it also destroyed two monitoring wells.

Reinforcing the bank will offer some protection medium-term, but it is not likely to permanently stop erosion. This is because the bluffs and topography in the area of the coal plant direct the river flow toward the coal ash pits. When the river is at high flow, boulders, downed trees, and ice flows forcefully scour the banks. There is no other route for the river to take (see graphic, below).

These factors, compounded by an expected increased intensity of storm events caused by a changing climate, raise concern that any bank stabilization measure eventually will be compromised by the natural forces of the river. No bank reinforcement will last forever. We know that the river has demonstrated it can erode through even robust bank stabilization. After Dynegy leaves, the responsibilities for repair; replacement; and cleanup, in the event one or more of the impoundments is breached, could fall upon the taxpayer.

Covering the pits will not separate the ash from the groundwater, nor prevent the lateral flow of groundwater through the ash from the west toward the river.  Hydrogeological studies by Dynegy’s consultants have confirmed that groundwater moves from the western side of the river valley, through the North and Old East Ash Pits toward the Middle Fork, discharging into the river. The proposed closure plan would reduce infiltration from above the pits, but not eliminate the flow of groundwater toward the river. Under flood conditions, the rising river water could come into direct contact with the coal ash in the unlined pits. As the water recedes, it would flow back into the river carrying with it coal ash pollutants. This phenomenon would not be eliminated by capping the pits.

Although to the naked eye, the coal ash appears to lie well above the river, Dynegy’s hydro-geological studies show that the ash in the North and Old East Ash Pits extends down as much as 30 and 44 feet respectively, intersecting the water table.

North Ash Pond Cross--Section showing continued groundwater flow through ash pit with (or without) cap. Prepared by Andrew Rehn, Prairie Rivers Network. September 2016.

A comparison of 2011 water table elevations with ash deposits shows that the ash was saturated with groundwater (up to 21 feet in the North Ash Pit in June, 2011). Even if the ash pits are capped, groundwater will continue to flow through the toxic material and carry coal ash chemicals into the river

What Should Dynegy Do?

Dynegy needs to act responsibly and move its contaminated waste out of the floodplain of the Middle Fork of the Vermilion River to a properly-designed facility upland on its property. Dynegy also should install modern pollution controls and monitoring. This is the only permanent solution that will ensure that area groundwater and surface waters will be protected from future contamination for generations to come.

What Can You Do?

One easy way to take action now is to send a letter to State Senator Scott Bennett, State Representative Chad Hays, Danville's Mayor Scott Eisenhauer, and County Board Chair Michael Marron.  Ask them to call on Governor Rauner and the Director of the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency (IEPA) to tell the IEPA its time to require Dynegy to move its coal ash from the floodplain to a properly-designed facility on its property, away from the river.  Then send the second letter to the Governor and Director of the IEPA.  We've created a letter you can use or edit. Personalizing your letter will have the most impact.

Other states are requiring utility companies to relocate their ash, so why aren't we?

WRITE TO VERMILION COUNTY ELECTED OFFICIALS

They can talk directly with Governor Rauner and IEPA Director Messina

WRITE TO THE GOVERNOR AND IEPA DIRECTOR MESSINA

They can talk directly with the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency
%d bloggers like this: